ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE EXECUTION OF POST-FUEL SUBSIDY REMOVAL SUPPORT INITIATIVES IN KWARA STATE, NIGERIA: A FOCUS ON ISLAMIC PRINCIPLES

Abstract

Nigeria, with a focus on the application of Islamic principles. The contentious issue of subsidy removal carries 
significant social and economic consequences, emphasizing the crucial role of ethical considerations in policy 
implementation. The research provides a comprehensive background on fuel subsidy removal in Nigeria and its 
implications. Examining post-fuel subsidy removal palliative measures in Kwara State, the study focuses on design 
and implementation challenges, ethical considerations, transparency, equity, and public trust. Utilizing a case study 
approach, it offers insights and best practices. The methodology includes primary sources through in-depth oral 
interviews with the beneficiaries and community leaders. And secondary sources like textbooks and journals, aiming 
for a holistic understanding of the ethical dimensions of support initiatives within the context of Islamic principles in 
Kwara State. The objective is to contribute to policy decisions and community development. The study recommends 
an ethically sound implementation of post-fuel subsidy removal support initiatives, emphasizing transparency, 
accountability, and inclusivity. It advocates for the inclusiveness of governmental palliatives, reaching both civil 
servants and common individuals in the state. Continuous distribution during fuel subsidy removal challenges is 
deemed vital. Additionally, extending free or subsidized transportation beyond higher institutions to the general 
populace is suggested. Consideration should also be given to reducing governmental hospital bills or providing free 
health services. The study underscores the importance of Islamic ethics in Nigerian governance and employs a case 
study approach to assess palliative measures in Kwara State, offering practical insights for policymakers and 
stakeholders.